The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Repurposing Immunomodulatory Imide Drugs (IMiDs) in Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.656921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoo Jin Jung, David Tweedie, Michael T. Scerba, Dong Seok Kim, Maria Francesca Palmas, Augusta Pisanu, Anna R. Carta, Nigel H. Greig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,082,753
of 26,315,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,146
of 11,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,329
of 459,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#36
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,315,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.