The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systems and Circuits Linking Chronic Pain and Circadian Rhythms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.705173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew E. Warfield, Jonathan F. Prather, William D. Todd |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 11 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,864,617
of 25,967,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#980
of 11,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,138
of 456,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#28
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,967,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.