You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.734182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Outram, Katrina A. Muñoz, Kristin Kostick-Quenet, Clarissa E. Sanchez, Lavina Kalwani, Richa Lavingia, Laura Torgerson, Demetrio Sierra-Mercado, Jill O. Robinson, Stacey Pereira, Barbara A. Koenig, Philip A. Starr, Aysegul Gunduz, Kelly D. Foote, Michael S. Okun, Wayne K. Goodman, Amy L. McGuire, Peter Zuk, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 63% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,869,194
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,437
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,803
of 437,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#114
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.