The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retraction: Mechanisms Contributing to the Generation of Mayer Waves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.793064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frontiers Editorial Office |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,586,297
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,526
of 11,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,683
of 449,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#36
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.