↓ Skip to main content

Exploring high-order correlations with deep-broad learning for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring high-order correlations with deep-broad learning for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.1046268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoke Hao, Qijin An, Jiayang Li, Hongjie Min, Yingchun Guo, Ming Yu, Jing Qin

Abstract

Recently, a lot of research has been conducted on diagnosing neurological disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is the commonly used technique to assist in the diagnosis of ASD. In the past years, some conventional methods have been proposed to extract the low-order functional connectivity network features for ASD diagnosis, which ignore the complexity and global features of the brain network. Most deep learning-based methods generally have a large number of parameters that need to be adjusted during the learning process. To overcome the limitations mentioned above, we propose a novel deep-broad learning method for learning the higher-order brain functional connectivity network features to assist in ASD diagnosis. Specifically, we first construct the high-order functional connectivity network that describes global correlations of the brain regions based on hypergraph, and then we use the deep-broad learning method to extract the high-dimensional feature representations for brain networks sequentially. The evaluation of the proposed method is conducted on Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) dataset. The results show that our proposed method can achieve 71.8% accuracy on the multi-center dataset and 70.6% average accuracy on 17 single-center datasets, which are the best results compared with the state-of-the-art methods. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can describe the global features of the brain regions and get rich discriminative information for the classification task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 10%
Computer Science 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,472
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,170
of 488,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#266
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.