↓ Skip to main content

Optimal modes of mind-body exercise for treating chronic non-specific low back pain: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal modes of mind-body exercise for treating chronic non-specific low back pain: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.1046518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Shi, Zheng-Yu Hu, Yu-Rong Wen, Ya-Fei Wang, Yang-Yang Lin, Hao-Zhi Zhao, You-Tian Lin, Yu-Ling Wang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 24 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 24 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#18,178,209
of 26,592,204 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,370
of 11,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,764
of 509,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#207
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,592,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.