↓ Skip to main content

CHIP Decline Is Associated With Isoflurane-Induced Neurodegeneration in Aged Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CHIP Decline Is Associated With Isoflurane-Induced Neurodegeneration in Aged Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.824871
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiaoqiao Xu, Juan Xiong, Li Xu, Yuanyuan Wu, Man Li, Qinqin Li, Tao Jiang, Ailin Luo, Yi Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,472
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,002
of 460,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#334
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.