The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers Revisited From the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis Standpoint
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.837390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah O. T. Alawode, Nick C. Fox, Henrik Zetterberg, Amanda J. Heslegrave |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,011,689
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,109
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,010
of 446,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#33
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.