↓ Skip to main content

An effective sparsity evaluation criterion for power-line interference suppression of EEG signal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An effective sparsity evaluation criterion for power-line interference suppression of EEG signal
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.984471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi-xiang Yang, Bin-qiang Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,757,147
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,465
of 11,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,690
of 492,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#92
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.