The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain mechanisms underlying the influence of emotions on spatial decision-making: An EEG study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.989988 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yanyan Zhao, Danli Wang, Xinyuan Wang, Steve C. Chiu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 17% |
Psychology | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,527,480
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,706
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,118
of 438,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#55
of 442 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 442 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.