↓ Skip to main content

Plasma urea cycle metabolite levels and the risk of moyamoya disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma urea cycle metabolite levels and the risk of moyamoya disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1163733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaofan Yu, Peicong Ge, Yuanren Zhai, Wei Liu, Qian Zhang, Xun Ye, Xingju Liu, Rong Wang, Yan Zhang, Jizong Zhao, Dong Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,499,559
of 26,390,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,812
of 11,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,002
of 375,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#285
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,390,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.