The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CRISPR/Cas9: implication for modeling and therapy of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2023.1223777 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yajun Shi, Yan Zhao, Likui Lu, Qinqin Gao, Dongyi Yu, Miao Sun |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,671
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,482
of 367,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#60
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.