↓ Skip to main content

Neurocognitive function in children with cochlear implants and hearing aids: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurocognitive function in children with cochlear implants and hearing aids: a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1242949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jefferson Vilela da Silva Lima, Caroline Favaretto Martins de Morais, Nelma Ellen Zamberlan-Amorim, Patricia Pupin Mandrá, Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa Reis

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Psychology 3 19%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,427,992
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,080
of 11,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,062
of 358,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#143
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.