↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Mechanism and pharmacodynamic material basis of neurodegenerative disease therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Mechanism and pharmacodynamic material basis of neurodegenerative disease therapies
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1254881
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erxi Wu, Ronghu Ke, Dan Qi, Jason H. Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,713,898
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,186
of 11,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,654
of 361,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#50
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.