The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lithium: effects in animal models of vanishing white matter are not promising
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1275744 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diede Witkamp, Ellen Oudejans, Leoni Hoogterp, Gino V. Hu-A-Ng, Kathryn A. Glaittli, Tamara J. Stevenson, Marleen Huijsmans, Truus E. M. Abbink, Marjo S. van der Knaap, Joshua L. Bonkowsky |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,763,563
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,092
of 11,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,079
of 218,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#105
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.