The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protective effects of butyrate on cerebral ischaemic injury in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1304906 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shichang Yan, Qipei Ji, Jilin Ding, Zhixiang Liu, Wei Wei, Huaqiang Li, Luojie Li, Chuan Ma, Defu Liao, Ziyan He, Shuangchun Ai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,362,022
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,905
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,794
of 337,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#151
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.