The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Top 100 most-cited articles on tau protein: a bibliometric analysis and evidence mapping
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1345225 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zheping Chen, Guoliang Shan, Xinyue Wang, Yaqun Zuo, Xinyu Song, Yufeng Ma, Xin Zhao, Yanwu Jin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,820,554
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,655
of 11,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,711
of 213,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#21
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.