↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the role of underrepresented populations in polygenic risk scores for neurodegenerative disease risk prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the role of underrepresented populations in polygenic risk scores for neurodegenerative disease risk prediction
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2024.1380860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Step, Carene Anne Alene Ndong Sima, Ignacio Mata, Soraya Bardien

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,031,748
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,753
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,735
of 214,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.