The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A practical guide for combining functional regions of interest and white matter bundles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1385847 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven L. Meisler, Emily Kubota, Mareike Grotheer, John D. E. Gabrieli, Kalanit Grill-Spector |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,476,392
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,085
of 11,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,277
of 156,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#16
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.