The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and validation of novel engineered AAV capsid variants targeting human glia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1435212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Giacomoni, Malin Åkerblom, Mette Habekost, Alessandro Fiorenzano, Janko Kajtez, Marcus Davidsson, Malin Parmar, Tomas Björklund |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,575,207
of 26,556,052 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,700
of 11,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,866
of 186,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#43
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,052 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.