The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A review of the roles of pathogens in Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2024.1439055 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Meng Zhao, Yongchun Wang, Yanxin Shen, Chunxiao Wei, Guimei Zhang, Li Sun |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 57% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 57% |
Psychology | 1 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,137,433
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,811
of 11,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,067
of 184,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#17
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.