↓ Skip to main content

iP3T: an interpretable multimodal time-series model for enhanced gait phase prediction in wearable exoskeletons

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
iP3T: an interpretable multimodal time-series model for enhanced gait phase prediction in wearable exoskeletons
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2024.1457623
Authors

Hui Chen, Xiangyang Wang, Yang Xiao, Beixian Wu, Zhuo Wang, Yao Liu, Peiyi Wang, Chunjie Chen, Xinyu Wu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#23,885,769
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10,511
of 11,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,617
of 141,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#79
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.