The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Stay Tuned”: Inter-Individual Neural Synchronization During Mutual Gaze and Joint Attention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnint.2010.00127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daisuke N. Saito, Hiroki C. Tanabe, Keise Izuma, Masamichi J. Hayashi, Yusuke Morito, Hidetsugu Komeda, Hitoshi Uchiyama, Hirotaka Kosaka, Hidehiko Okazawa, Yasuhisa Fujibayashi, Norihiro Sadato |
| Abstract |
Eye contact provides a communicative link between humans, prompting joint attention. As spontaneous brain activity might have an important role in the coordination of neuronal processing within the brain, their inter-subject synchronization might occur during eye contact. To test this, we conducted simultaneous functional MRI in pairs of adults. Eye contact was maintained at baseline while the subjects engaged in real-time gaze exchange in a joint attention task. Averted gaze activated the bilateral occipital pole extending to the right posterior superior temporal sulcus, the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex, and the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. Following a partner's gaze toward an object activated the left intraparietal sulcus. After all the task-related effects were modeled out, inter-individual correlation analysis of residual time-courses was performed. Paired subjects showed more prominent correlations than non-paired subjects in the right inferior frontal gyrus, suggesting that this region is involved in sharing intention during eye contact that provides the context for joint attention. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 127 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,271,609
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#124
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,384
of 166,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.