↓ Skip to main content

Probing myelin and axon abnormalities separately in psychiatric disorders using MRI techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probing myelin and axon abnormalities separately in psychiatric disorders using MRI techniques
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2013.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Du, Dost Öngür

Abstract

In this manuscript we present novel MRI approaches to dissecting axon vs. myelin abnormalities in psychiatric disorders. Existing DTI approaches are not able to provide specific information on these subcellular elements but novel approaches are beginning to do so. We review two approaches (magnetization transfer ratio-MTR; and diffusion tensor spectroscopy-DTS) and the theoretical framework for interpreting data derived from these approaches. Work is ongoing to collect data that will answer some relevant questions using these techniques in schizophrenia and related conditions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 10 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Engineering 6 13%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,891,434
of 26,401,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#374
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,228
of 294,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#54
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,401,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.