You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Probing myelin and axon abnormalities separately in psychiatric disorders using MRI techniques
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnint.2013.00024 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fei Du, Dost Öngür |
Abstract |
In this manuscript we present novel MRI approaches to dissecting axon vs. myelin abnormalities in psychiatric disorders. Existing DTI approaches are not able to provide specific information on these subcellular elements but novel approaches are beginning to do so. We review two approaches (magnetization transfer ratio-MTR; and diffusion tensor spectroscopy-DTS) and the theoretical framework for interpreting data derived from these approaches. Work is ongoing to collect data that will answer some relevant questions using these techniques in schizophrenia and related conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
Researcher | 10 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Engineering | 6 | 13% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,891,434
of 26,401,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#374
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,228
of 294,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#54
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,401,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.