↓ Skip to main content

What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2014.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles-Edouard Notredame, Delphine Pins, Sophie Deneve, Renaud Jardri

Abstract

Illusion, namely a mismatch between the objective and perceived properties of an object present in the environment, is a common feature of visual perception, both in normal and pathological conditions. This makes illusion a valuable tool with which to explore normal perception and its impairments. Although still debated, the hypothesis of a modified, and typically diminished, susceptibility to illusions in schizophrenia patients is supported by a growing number of studies. The current paper aimed to review how illusions have been used to explore and reveal the core features of visual perception in schizophrenia from a psychophysical, neurophysiological and functional point of view. We propose an integration of these findings into a common hierarchical Bayesian inference framework. The Bayesian formalism considers perception as the optimal combination between sensory evidence and prior knowledge, thereby highlighting the interweaving of perceptions and beliefs. Notably, it offers a holistic and convincing explanation for the perceptual changes observed in schizophrenia that might be ideally tested using illusory paradigms, as well as potential paths to explore neural mechanisms. Implications for psychopathology (in terms of positive symptoms, subjective experience or behavior disruptions) are critically discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 268 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 21%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 26%
Neuroscience 67 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 55 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,026,297
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#148
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,112
of 244,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.