↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine systems adaptation during acquisition and consolidation of a skill

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopamine systems adaptation during acquisition and consolidation of a skill
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2014.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang H. Sommer, Rui M. Costa, Anita C. Hansson

Abstract

The striatum plays a key role in motor learning. Striatal function depends strongly on dopaminergic neurotransmission, but little is known about neuroadaptions of the dopamine system during striatal learning. Using an established task that allows differentiation between acquisition and consolidation of motor learning, we here investigate D1 and D2-like receptor binding and transcriptional levels after initial and long-term training of mice. We found profound reduction in D1 binding within the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) after the first training session on the accelerated rotarod and a progressive reduction in D2-like binding within the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) after extended training. Given that similar phase- and region-specific striatal neuroadaptations have been found also during learning of complex procedural tasks including habit formation and automatic responding, the here observed neurochemical alterations are important for our understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders that show a dysbalance in the function of striatal circuits, such as in addictive behaviors.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 27%
Neuroscience 21 26%
Psychology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,152,066
of 26,552,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#643
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,314
of 276,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.