↓ Skip to main content

Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2015.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosanna De Meo, Micah M. Murray, Stephanie Clarke, Pawel J. Matusz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 31%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 38%
Neuroscience 37 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#12,625,884
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#360
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,726
of 256,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.