↓ Skip to main content

Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2015.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Durk Talsma

Abstract

Multisensory integration involves a host of different cognitive processes, occurring at different stages of sensory processing. Here I argue that, despite recent insights suggesting that multisensory interactions can occur at very early latencies, the actual integration of individual sensory traces into an internally consistent mental representation is dependent on both top-down and bottom-up processes. Moreover, I argue that this integration is not limited to just sensory inputs, but that internal cognitive processes also shape the resulting mental representation. Studies showing that memory recall is affected by the initial multisensory context in which the stimuli were presented will be discussed, as well as several studies showing that mental imagery can affect multisensory illusions. This empirical evidence will be discussed from a predictive coding perspective, in which a central top-down attentional process is proposed to play a central role in coordinating the integration of all these inputs into a coherent mental representation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 396 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 24%
Researcher 63 15%
Student > Master 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 61 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 142 34%
Neuroscience 80 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 4%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 87 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,911,838
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#102
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,651
of 268,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.