↓ Skip to main content

A Translational Framework of Educational Neuroscience in Learning Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Translational Framework of Educational Neuroscience in Learning Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2018.00025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Dresler, Stephanie Bugden, Camilo Gouet, Marie Lallier, Darlene G. Oliveira, Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas, Ana C. Pires, Yunqi Wang, Camila Zugarramurdi, Janaina Weissheimer

Abstract

Neuroimaging has undergone enormous progress during the last two and a half decades. The combination of neuroscientific methods and educational practice has become a focus of interdisciplinary research in order to answer more applied questions. In this realm, conditions that hamper learning success and have deleterious effects in the population - such as learning disorders (LD) - could especially profit from neuroimaging findings. At the moment, however, there is an ongoing debate about how far neuroscientific research can go to inform the practical work in educational settings. Here, we put forward a theoretical translational framework as a method of conducting neuroimaging and bridging it to education, with a main focus on dyscalculia and dyslexia. Our work seeks to represent a theoretical but mainly empirical guide on the benefits of neuroimaging, which can help people working with different aspects of LD, who need to act collaboratively to reach the full potential of neuroimaging. We provide possible ideas regarding how neuroimaging can inform LD at different levels within our multidirectional framework, i.e., mechanisms, diagnosis/prognosis, training/intervention, and community/education. In addition, we discuss methodological, conceptual, and structural limitations that need to be addressed by future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 18%
Neuroscience 15 16%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 38 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,256,451
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#317
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,187
of 328,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.