↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2020.556660
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Camarata, Lucy Jane Miller, Mark T. Wallace

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Researcher 14 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Lecturer 11 4%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 133 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 48 19%
Psychology 21 8%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 137 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,478,539
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#78
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,434
of 519,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.