The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pivotal role of GSK-3 in synaptic plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarrisa A. Bradley, Stéphane Peineau, Changiz Taghibiglou, Celine S. Nicolas, Daniel J. Whitcomb, Zuner A. Bortolotto, Bong-Kiun Kaang, Kwangwook Cho, Yu Tian Wang, Graham L. Collingridge |
| Abstract |
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) has many cellular functions. Recent evidence suggests that it plays a key role in certain types of synaptic plasticity, in particular a form of long-term depression (LTD) that is induced by the synaptic activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). In the present article we summarize what is currently known concerning the roles of GSK-3 in synaptic plasticity at both glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. We summarize its role in cognition and speculate on how alterations in the synaptic functioning of GSK-3 may be a major factor in certain neurodegenerative disorders. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 21% |
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 48 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,798,571
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#366
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,966
of 244,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#7
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.