↓ Skip to main content

Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Identification of EGFP Tagged Neurons during Calcium Imaging by Means of Two-Photon Spectral Separation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Identification of EGFP Tagged Neurons during Calcium Imaging by Means of Two-Photon Spectral Separation
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Brondi, Sebastian Sulis Sato, Luigi Federico Rossi, Silvia Ferrara, Gian Michele Ratto

Abstract

The combination of two-photon in vivo imaging and genetic labeling of specific cell types in the mouse brain is a powerful method to refine our understanding of brain circuitry and to dissect the contribution of specific neural classes to cortical function. The synthetic calcium indicators are the best fluorescent reporters for cellular activity that are presently available but their spectral proprieties are often overlapped with those of the fluorescent proteins used for genetic labeling. Such is the case of Oregon Green BAPTA1 and EGFP, the most widely used fluorophores for targeted two-photon imaging. The emission spectra of these molecules are virtually identical, precluding their separation by narrow band filters at the detector side. However, even if their one photon excitation spectra are very similar, their two-photon excitation spectra differ significantly: here we show how it is possible to exploit this difference to separate the relative contributions of EGFP and Oregon Green to the total fluorescence signal. This approach addresses two different issues: the unbiased detection of cells expressing EGFP in a cortical volume injected with Oregon Green, and the computation of the Ca(2+) insensitive fluorescence background. The latter data is essential for the quantitative comparison of the relative changes in Ca(2+) concentration between different cells, containing variable concentrations of EGFP. This strategy can be easily extended to any couple of fluorophores provided that have a different two-photon excitation spectra.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 43%
Neuroscience 10 24%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,437
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,205
of 244,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#37
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.