↓ Skip to main content

Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
660 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1593 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2013.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasper Akerboom, Nicole Carreras Calderón, Lin Tian, Sebastian Wabnig, Matthias Prigge, Johan Tolö, Andrew Gordus, Michael B. Orger, Kristen E. Severi, John J. Macklin, Ronak Patel, Stefan R. Pulver, Trevor J. Wardill, Elisabeth Fischer, Christina Schüler, Tsai-Wen Chen, Karen S. Sarkisyan, Jonathan S. Marvin, Cornelia I. Bargmann, Douglas S. Kim, Sebastian Kügler, Leon Lagnado, Peter Hegemann, Alexander Gottschalk, Eric R. Schreiter, Loren L. Looger

Abstract

Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are powerful tools for systems neuroscience. Here we describe red, single-wavelength GECIs, "RCaMPs," engineered from circular permutation of the thermostable red fluorescent protein mRuby. High-resolution crystal structures of mRuby, the red sensor RCaMP, and the recently published red GECI R-GECO1 give insight into the chromophore environments of the Ca(2+)-bound state of the sensors and the engineered protein domain interfaces of the different indicators. We characterized the biophysical properties and performance of RCaMP sensors in vitro and in vivo in Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila larvae, and larval zebrafish. Further, we demonstrate 2-color calcium imaging both within the same cell (registering mitochondrial and somatic [Ca(2+)]) and between two populations of cells: neurons and astrocytes. Finally, we perform integrated optogenetics experiments, wherein neural activation via channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) or a red-shifted variant, and activity imaging via RCaMP or GCaMP, are conducted simultaneously, with the ChR2/RCaMP pair providing independently addressable spectral channels. Using this paradigm, we measure calcium responses of naturalistic and ChR2-evoked muscle contractions in vivo in crawling C. elegans. We systematically compare the RCaMP sensors to R-GECO1, in terms of action potential-evoked fluorescence increases in neurons, photobleaching, and photoswitching. R-GECO1 displays higher Ca(2+) affinity and larger dynamic range than RCaMP, but exhibits significant photoactivation with blue and green light, suggesting that integrated channelrhodopsin-based optogenetics using R-GECO1 may be subject to artifact. Finally, we create and test blue, cyan, and yellow variants engineered from GCaMP by rational design. This engineered set of chromatic variants facilitates new experiments in functional imaging and optogenetics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,593 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 32 2%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Japan 6 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 15 <1%
Unknown 1509 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 451 28%
Researcher 342 21%
Student > Master 179 11%
Student > Bachelor 127 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 76 5%
Other 237 15%
Unknown 181 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 591 37%
Neuroscience 327 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 173 11%
Engineering 80 5%
Physics and Astronomy 59 4%
Other 167 10%
Unknown 196 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,141,843
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#78
of 3,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,284
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.