↓ Skip to main content

Role of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ signaling in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ signaling in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2013.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Popugaeva, Ilya Bezprozvanny

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major threat of twenty-first century that is responsible for the majority of dementia in the elderly. Development of effective AD-preventing therapies are the top priority tasks for neuroscience research. Amyloid hypothesis of AD is a dominant idea in the field, but so far all amyloid-targeting therapies have failed in clinical trials. In addition to amyloid accumulation, there are consistent reports of abnormal calcium signaling in AD neurons. AD neurons exhibit enhanced intracellular calcium (Ca(2) (+)) liberation from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and reduced store-operated Ca(2) (+) entry (SOC). These changes occur primarily as a result of ER Ca(2) (+) overload. We argue that normalization of intracellular Ca(2) (+) homeostasis could be a strategy for development of effective disease-modifying therapies. The current review summarizes recent data about changes in ER Ca(2) (+) signaling in AD. Ca(2) (+) channels that are discussed in the current review include: inositol trisphosphate receptors, ryanodine receptors, presenilins as ER Ca(2) (+) leak channels, and neuronal SOC channels. We discuss how function of these channels is altered in AD and how important are resulting Ca(2) (+) signaling changes for AD pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 26%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 17%
Neuroscience 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,202,510
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,448
of 2,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,784
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#32
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.