You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long non-coding RNAs in neurodevelopmental disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2013.00053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilse I. G. M. van deVondervoort, Peter M. Gordebeke, Nima Khoshab, Paul H. E. Tiesinga, Jan K. Buitelaar, Tamas Kozicz, Armaz Aschrafi, Jeffrey C. Glennon |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have emphasized an important role for long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) in epigenetic regulation, development, and disease. Despite growing interest in lncRNAs, the mechanisms by which lncRNAs control cellular processes are still elusive. Improved understanding of these mechanisms is critical, because the majority of the mammalian genome is transcribed, in most cases resulting in non-coding RNA products. Recent studies have suggested the involvement of lncRNA in neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders, highlighting the functional importance of this subclass of brain-enriched RNAs. Impaired expression of lnRNAs has been implicated in several forms of intellectual disability disorders. However, the role of this family of RNAs in cognitive function is largely unknown. Here we provide an overview of recently identified mechanisms of neuronal development involving lncRNAs, and the consequences of lncRNA deregulation for neurodevelopmental disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,926,695
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,688
of 3,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,875
of 290,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.