↓ Skip to main content

Biometal Dyshomeostasis and Toxic Metal Accumulations in the Development of Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biometal Dyshomeostasis and Toxic Metal Accumulations in the Development of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Li, Qian Jiao, Huamin Xu, Xixun Du, Limin Shi, Fengju Jia, Hong Jiang

Abstract

Biometal dyshomeostasis and toxic metal accumulation are common features in many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease. The neurotoxic effects of metal imbalance are generally associated with reduced enzymatic activities, elevated protein aggregation and oxidative stress in the central nervous system, in which a cascade of events lead to cell death and neurodegeneration. Although the links between biometal imbalance and neurodegenerative disorders remain elusive, a major class of endogenous proteins involved in metal transport has been receiving increasing attention over recent decades. The abnormal expression of these proteins has been linked to biometal imbalance and to the pathogenesis of AD. Here, we present a brief overview of the physiological roles of biometals including iron, zinc, copper, manganese, magnesium and calcium, and provide a detailed description of their transporters and their synergistic involvement in the development of AD. In addition, we also review the published data relating to neurotoxic metals in AD, including aluminum, lead, cadmium, and mercury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 49 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Chemistry 9 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 57 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,084,031
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,438
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,030
of 327,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#42
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.