↓ Skip to main content

Glut9-mediated Urate Uptake Is Responsible for Its Protective Effects on Dopaminergic Neurons in Parkinson’s Disease Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glut9-mediated Urate Uptake Is Responsible for Its Protective Effects on Dopaminergic Neurons in Parkinson’s Disease Models
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mingxia Bi, Qian Jiao, Xixun Du, Hong Jiang

Abstract

Considerable evidence has shown that elevated plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) urate levels correlated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). Based on its anti-oxidative properties, urate might serve as one of promising neuroprotective candidates for PD. However, how urate is transported through cell membranes to exert its effects inside the cells in PD is largely unknown. To elucidate this, we showed that increased intracellular urate exerted its neuroprotective effects against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced neurotoxicity in MES23.5 cells and elevated urate could antagonize 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced nigral dopaminergic neuronal death in urate oxidase (UOx) knockout (KO) mice. Its transporter, glucose transporter type 9 (Glut9), was observed up-regulated, which was caused by the activation of p53. These protective effects could be abolished by Glut9 blocker and p53 inhibitor. These results suggested that Glut9 was a functional urate transporter, whose up-regulation by activation of p53 resulted in the increased intracellular urate levels in PD models. Our findings suggest that Glut9 could be modified to modulate urate levels in dopaminergic neurons and urate-elevating strategies without increasing systemic levels to avoid side effects might serve as a potential therapeutic target for PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,939,131
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,385
of 3,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,274
of 454,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#92
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.