The fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by a CGG repeat expansion at the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene. FMR1 alleles with more than 200 CGG repeats bear chromosomal fragility when cells experience folate deficiency. CGG repeats were reported to be able to form secondary structures, such as hairpins, in vitro. When such secondary structures are formed, repeats can lead to replication fork stalling even in the absence of any additional perturbation. Indeed, it was recently shown that the replication forks stall at the endogenous FMR1 locus in unaffected and FXS cells, suggesting the formation of secondary repeat structures at the FMR1 gene in vivo. If not dealt with properly replication fork stalling can lead to polymerase slippage and repeat expansion as well as fragile site expression. Despite the presence of repeat structures at the FMR1 locus, chromosomal fragility is only expressed under replicative stress suggesting the existence of potential molecular mechanisms that help the replication fork progress through these repeat regions. DNA helicases are known to aid replication forks progress through repetitive DNA sequences. Yet, the identity of the DNA helicase(s) responsible for unwinding the CGG repeats at FMR1 locus is not known. We found that the human DNA helicase B (HDHB) may provide an answer for this question. We used chromatin-immunoprecipitation assay to study the FMR1 region and common fragile sites (CFS), and asked whether HDHB localizes at replication forks stalled at repetitive regions even in unperturbed cells. HDHB was strongly enriched in S-phase at the repetitive DNA at CFS and FMR1 gene but not in the flanking regions. Taken together, these results suggest that HDHB functions in preventing or repairing stalled replication forks that arise in repeat-rich regions even in unperturbed cells. Furthermore, we discuss the importance and potential role of HDHB and other helicases in the resolution of secondary CGG repeat structures.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,456,471
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,848
of 2,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,625
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#77
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
