The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complement C3 Affects Rac1 Activity in the Developing Brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Gorelik, Tamar Sapir, Lihi Ben-Reuven, Orly Reiner |
| Abstract |
The complement system, which is part of the innate immune response system, has been recently shown to participate in multiple key processes in the developing brain. Here we aimed to elucidate downstream signaling responses linking complement C3, a key molecule of the pathway, to small GTPases, known to affect the cytoskeleton. The expression pattern of the activated small GTPase Rac1 resembled that of complement C3. C3-deficient mice exhibited reduced Rac1 and elevated RhoA activity in comparison with control mice. The most pronounced reduction of Rac1 activity occurred at embryonic day 14. Rac1 has been implicated in neuronal migration as well as neuronal stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Consistent with the reduction in Rac1 activity, the expression of phospho-cofilin, decreased in migrating neurons. Reduced Rac1-GTP was also correlated with a decrease in the expression of progenitor markers (Nestin, Pax6 and Tbr2) and conversely the expression of neuronal markers (Dcx and NeuN) increased in C3 knockout (KO) cortices in comparison with wild-type (WT) cortices. More specifically, C3 deficiency resulted in a reduction in the number of the cells in S-phase and an elevation in the number of cells that precociously exited the cell cycle. Collectively, our findings suggest that C3 impacts the activity of small GTPases resulting in cell cycle defects and premature neuronal differentiation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,486,884
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,502
of 2,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,601
of 327,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#112
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.