↓ Skip to main content

What’s the Function of Connexin 32 in the Peripheral Nervous System?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What’s the Function of Connexin 32 in the Peripheral Nervous System?
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Bortolozzi

Abstract

Connexin 32 (Cx32) is a fundamental protein in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) as its mutations cause the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT1X), the second most common form of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy and a demyelinating disease for which there is no effective therapy. Since mutations of the GJB1 gene encoding Cx32 were first reported in 1993, over 450 different mutations associated with CMT1X including missense, frameshift, deletion and non-sense ones have been identified. Despite the availability of a sizable number of studies focusing on normal and mutated Cx32 channel properties, the crucial role played by Cx32 in the PNS has not yet been elucidated, as well as the molecular pathogenesis of CMT1X. Is Cx32 fundamental during a particular phase of Schwann cell (SC) life? Are Cx32 paired (gap junction, GJ) channels in myelinated SCs important for peripheral nerve homeostasis? The attractive hypothesis that short coupling of adjacent myelin layers by Cx32 GJs is required for efficient diffusion of K+ and signaling molecules is still debated, while a growing body of evidence is supporting other possible functions of Cx32 in the PNS, mainly related to Cx32 unpaired channels (hemichannels), which could be involved in a purinergic-dependent pathway controlling myelination. Here we review the intriguing puzzle of findings about Cx32 function and dysfunction, discussing possible directions for future investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Neuroscience 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,507
of 2,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,872
of 326,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#106
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.