The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Human Tau Expression Does Not Induce Mouse Retina Neurodegeneration, Suggesting Differential Toxicity of Tau in Brain vs. Retinal Neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Léa Rodriguez, Julius Baya Mdzomba, Sandrine Joly, Mélissa Boudreau-Laprise, Emmanuel Planel, Vincent Pernet |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,245,298
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#639
of 2,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,880
of 350,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#36
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.