↓ Skip to main content

Novel compound heterozygous variants in EMC1 associated with global developmental delay: a lesson from a non-silent synonymous exonic mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel compound heterozygous variants in EMC1 associated with global developmental delay: a lesson from a non-silent synonymous exonic mutation
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1153156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ge Wang, Yanli Wang, Chao Gao, Wanqin Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,018,977
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,965
of 3,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,313
of 276,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.