The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deleterious and protective effects of epothilone-D alone and in the context of amyloid β- and tau-induced alterations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1198299 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ángel Abdiel Robles-Gómez, Benito Ordaz, Jonathan-Julio Lorea-Hernández, Fernando Peña-Ortega |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 50% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,671,258
of 24,751,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#717
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,018
of 254,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#9
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,751,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.