↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for radicular pain: a review of analgesic mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture for radicular pain: a review of analgesic mechanism
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1332876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Lin Li, Yi Zhang, Jian-Wei Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,623,614
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,237
of 3,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,851
of 351,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#19
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.