The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tackling neurodegeneration in vitro with omics: a path towards new targets and drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1414886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caterina Carraro, Jessica V. Montgomery, Julien Klimmt, Dominik Paquet, Joachim L. Schultze, Marc D. Beyer |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,060,223
of 26,250,639 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#773
of 3,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,679
of 205,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,250,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.