↓ Skip to main content

Function and Dysfunction of Microglia during Brain Development: Consequences for Synapses and Neural Circuits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Function and Dysfunction of Microglia during Brain Development: Consequences for Synapses and Neural Circuits
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2017.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosa C. Paolicelli, Maria T. Ferretti

Abstract

Many diverse factors, ranging from stress to infections, can perturb brain homeostasis and alter the physiological activity of microglia, the immune cells of the central nervous system. Microglia play critical roles in the process of synaptic maturation and brain wiring during development. Any perturbation affecting microglial physiological function during critical developmental periods could result in defective maturation of synaptic circuits. In this review, we critically appraise the recent literature on the alterations of microglial activity induced by environmental and genetic factors occurring at pre- and early post-natal stages. Furthermore, we discuss the long-lasting consequences of early-life microglial perturbation on synaptic function and on vulnerability to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 294 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 21%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 74 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 92 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 83 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,854,132
of 26,522,772 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#88
of 447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,310
of 330,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.