↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral and Neurophysiological Study of Olfactory Perception and Learning in Honeybees

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral and Neurophysiological Study of Olfactory Perception and Learning in Honeybees
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Christophe Sandoz

Abstract

The honeybee Apis mellifera has been a central insect model in the study of olfactory perception and learning for more than a century, starting with pioneer work by Karl von Frisch. Research on olfaction in honeybees has greatly benefited from the advent of a range of behavioral and neurophysiological paradigms in the Lab. Here I review major findings about how the honeybee brain detects, processes, and learns odors, based on behavioral, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological approaches. I first address the behavioral study of olfactory learning, from experiments on free-flying workers visiting artificial flowers to laboratory-based conditioning protocols on restrained individuals. I explain how the study of olfactory learning has allowed understanding the discrimination and generalization ability of the honeybee olfactory system, its capacity to grant special properties to olfactory mixtures as well as to retain individual component information. Next, based on the impressive amount of anatomical and immunochemical studies of the bee brain, I detail our knowledge of olfactory pathways. I then show how functional recordings of odor-evoked activity in the brain allow following the transformation of the olfactory message from the periphery until higher-order central structures. Data from extra- and intracellular electrophysiological approaches as well as from the most recent optical imaging developments are described. Lastly, I discuss results addressing how odor representation changes as a result of experience. This impressive ensemble of behavioral, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological data available in the bee make it an attractive model for future research aiming to understand olfactory perception and learning in an integrative fashion.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 9 4%
Italy 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 239 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Student > Master 47 18%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 51%
Neuroscience 40 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 43 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,855,390
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#552
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,580
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.