The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Adaptation Level Theory of Tinnitus Audibility
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00046 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Grant D. Searchfield, Kei Kobayashi, Michael Sanders |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
Researcher | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 16% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 12% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,195,101
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#386
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,649
of 244,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#10
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.