↓ Skip to main content

Classification of ADHD children through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification of ADHD children through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dai Dai, Jieqiong Wang, Jing Hua, Huiguang He

Abstract

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common diseases in school-age children. To date, the diagnosis of ADHD is mainly subjective and studies of objective diagnostic method are of great importance. Although many efforts have been made recently to investigate the use of structural and functional brain images for the diagnosis purpose, few of them are related to ADHD. In this paper, we introduce an automatic classification framework based on brain imaging features of ADHD patients and present in detail the feature extraction, feature selection, and classifier training methods. The effects of using different features are compared against each other. In addition, we integrate multimodal image features using multi-kernel learning (MKL). The performance of our framework has been validated in the ADHD-200 Global Competition, which is a world-wide classification contest on the ADHD-200 datasets. In this competition, our classification framework using features of resting-state functional connectivity (FC) was ranked the 6th out of 21 participants under the competition scoring policy and performed the best in terms of sensitivity and J-statistic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 14%
Neuroscience 19 12%
Engineering 17 11%
Computer Science 15 9%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#23,010,126
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,299
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,709
of 251,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#41
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.