The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The claustrum in review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian N. Mathur |
| Abstract |
The claustrum is among the most enigmatic of all prominent mammalian brain structures. Since the 19th century, a wealth of data has amassed on this forebrain nucleus. However, much of this data is disparate and contentious; conflicting views regarding the claustrum's structural definitions and possible functions abound. This review synthesizes historical and recent claustrum studies with the purpose of formulating an acceptable description of its structural properties. Integrating extant anatomical and functional literature with theorized functions of the claustrum, new visions of how this structure may be contributing to cognition and action are discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 99 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 10% |
| Psychology | 19 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#456
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,694
of 241,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#18
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.